Sent from my SM-G975F using TapatalkAlso if you bother to google, there are more than one review where people have have had issues and W&S have been less than helpful. IMHO the Keis is a very competent set up. I also have the remote control, which is very handy, and have used the heated gloves which work extremely well with the jacket. Both are very close fitting to the merino base layer I wear underneath and provide plenty of heat, which keeps me warm and toasty even on long Motorway runs. I use the jacket under my Rukka or Belstaff when it’s really cold, and the waistcoat in the autumn. Warm and Safe maybe fantastic as you say but Keis gear works perfectly well for me right through winter. If you want gear to take the cold edge off watching a match from the sidelines or working outside, the others will be just fine. If you want the heated gear for the moto, then W&S is a no brainer - that's my recommendation. W&S came out the other side in the right direction. Yes, there's an old story attached to Gebring and W&S. W&S have created heated jackets, base layers and trousers that can sit close to your body, under your existing clothes - especially the base layer top which I'm seriously considering myself instead of my existing jacket liner - the consequences of this is that you get way more heat for less power draw, the liners are unobtrusive by fitting under your existing gear. I have friends who also have Keis, so think either is good.Rash? Really? I have always had Gerbing gloves, had an issue with one after about 6 years and the gloves were replaced no questions asked. Anyways, I have just bought the Gerbing Premium jacket and it is brilliant. You will find everything with RFT is an "add-on".Bit rash, why have they got it right then? Warm and Safe were founded from the Gerbing crowd. They also just released their Cloud Assessment tool that looked good. It also has a new Breach Detection System that utilizes pieces from Huntress (not their full solution) All items can come as a ticket to your PSA as well as a virtual check list in their web portal. If you deploy CH as a VA, it can do weekly internal vulnerability scans. We use it to verify our own work in addition to what is being done through our RMM. The frequency of alerting was a hurdle for us initially but the cost of Cyber Hawk is nothing compared to a Managed SOC. It "learns" the environment and alerts on suspicious activity daily - not real time. It can be deployed as a VA or on an existing physical server. Also, you can tell who has theirs on true autopilot as the logo dimensions are quirky/elongated which causes the logo to not be centered on the title page.Ĭyber Hawk - This is their "insider threat detection" as they call it. A couple of MSSPs in our area uses this as part of their offering so its funny when we run across scans that are close to identical as ours just with a different logo. Reporter is also what is used to schedule/automate external vulnerability scans. You can also push the scan results to InDoc, still in Beta, that presents the recommendations as a checklist (but you can't actually cross them off yet). Like you said, you can script it with the RMM but we use it to dump the monthly reports to our PSA as a ticket for us to review and make recommendations/remediate. Reporter - Reporter is pretty cool as it schedules scans and report generation. Inspector also lets you do an internal vulnerability scan as you noted. Inspector - Inspector is good for ad-hoc IT assessments where you want to provide reporting and some basic network mapping without installing/running anything on customer system. The others are for our internal use and are included in our stack at various levels. This is really the only tool we use for prospecting. Network/Security Scan - I won't cover much here as its understood.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |